ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Construction and Validation of a General Medical Image Dataset for Pretraining.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Empowering photodynamic therapy with artificial intelligence: current trends and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- RadioGuide-DCN: A Radiomics-Guided Decorrelated Network for Medical Image Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep-Optimal Leucorrhea Detection Through Fluorescent Benchmark Data Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the field of deep learning for medical image analysis, training models from scratch are often used and sometimes, transfer learning from pretrained parameters on ImageNet models is also adopted. However, there is no universally accepted medical image dataset specifically designed for pretraining models currently. The purpose of this study is to construct such a general dataset and validate its effectiveness on downstream medical imaging tasks, including classification and segmentation. In this work, we first build a medical image dataset by collecting several public medical image datasets (CPMID). And then, some pretrained models used for transfer learning are obtained based on CPMID. Various-complexity Resnet and the Vision Transformer network are used as the backbone architectures. In the tasks of classification and segmentation on three other datasets, we compared the experimental results of training from scratch, from the pretrained parameters on ImageNet, and from the pretrained parameters on CPMID. Accuracy, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and class activation map are used as metrics for classification performance. Intersection over Union as the metric is for segmentation evaluation. Utilizing the pretrained parameters on the constructed dataset CPMID, we achieved the best classification accuracy, weighted accuracy, and ROC-AUC values on three validation datasets. Notably, the average classification accuracy outperformed ImageNet-based results by 4.30%, 8.86%, and 3.85% respectively. Furthermore, we achieved the optimal balanced outcome of performance and efficiency in both classification and segmentation tasks. The pretrained parameters on the proposed dataset CPMID are very effective for common tasks in medical image analysis such as classification and segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.