Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39147872›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2024

An electronic health record (EHR)-based risk calculator can predict fractures comparably to FRAX: a proof-of-concept study.

Rajesh K Jain, Eric Polley, Mark Weiner, Amy Iwamaye, Elbert Huang, Tamara Vokes

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Emerging applications of feature selection in osteoporosis research: from biomarker discovery to clinical decision support.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rajesh K JainSection of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 1027, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. rjain2@bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-284X
Eric PolleyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5152-8740
Mark WeinerClinical Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5586-9940
Amy IwamayeSection of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elbert HuangDepartment of Medicine and Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4628-2061
Tamara VokesSection of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 1027, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-9673

Funding

Optimizing Medical Decision Making for Older Patients with Type 2 DiabetesR01AG063391 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HUANG, ELBERT S., KARTER, ANDREW JOHN · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Research and Mentorship in Medical Decision Making for Chronic Diseases of Older AdultsK24AG069080 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HUANG, ELBERT S. · 2020 to 2024
$583k
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG069080NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information in the electronic health record (EHR), such as diagnoses, vital signs, utilization, medications, and laboratory values, may predict fractures well without the need to verbally ascertain risk factors. In our study, as a proof of concept, we developed and internally validated a fracture risk calculator using only information in the EHR. PURPOSE: Fracture risk calculators, such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, or FRAX, typically lie outside the clinician workflow. Conversely, the electronic health record (EHR) is at the center of the clinical workflow, and many variables in the EHR could predict fractures without having to verbally ascertain FRAX risk factors. We sought to evaluate the utility of EHR variables to predict fractures and, as a proof of concept, to create an EHR-based fracture risk model.

methodsRoutine clinical data from 24,189 subjects presenting to primary care from 2010 to 2018 was utilized. Major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) were captured by physician diagnosis codes. Data was split into training (n = 18,141) and test sets (n = 6048). We fit Cox regression models for candidate risk factors in the training set, and then created a global model using a backward stepwise approach. We then applied the model to the test set and compared the discrimination and calibration to FRAX.

resultsWe found variables related to vital signs, utilization, diagnoses, medications, and laboratory values to be associated with incident MOF. Our final model included 19 variables, including age, BMI, Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, and albumin levels. When applied to the test set, we found the discrimination (AUC 0.73 vs. 0.70, p = 0.08) and calibration were comparable to FRAX.

conclusionRoutinely collected data in EHR systems can generate adequate fracture predictions without the need to verbally ascertain fracture risk factors. In the future, this could allow for automated fracture prediction at the point of care to improve osteoporosis screening and treatment rates.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsOsteoporotic FracturesRisk AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProof of Concept StudyRisk FactorsElectronic health recordFracture riskFRAXPrediction

Identifiers

PMID39147872
PMCPMC12777739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.