ArticleCommunications chemistry2024
Influence of the backbone chemistry and ionic functional groups of five pairs of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes on complex coacervation.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Complex coacervate tissue adhesives: effect of polycation chemistry and ionic strength on cytocompatibility.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Coacervation in systems chemistry.Communications chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex coacervation plays an important role in various fields. Here, the influences of the backbone chemistry and ionic functional groups of five pairs of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes on complex coacervation were investigated. These pairs include synthetic polymers with aliphatic hydrocarbon backbones, peptides with amide bonds, and carbohydrates with glycosidic linkages. Despite sharing identical charged groups, specific pairs displayed distinct liquid/liquid and liquid/solid phase separations depending on the polyelectrolyte mixing ratio, buffer, and ionic strength. The coacervate phase boundary broadened in the orders: glycosidic linkages > amide backbone > aliphatic hydrocarbon backbone, and Tris-phosphate > Tris-acetate > Tris-chloride buffers. Coacervates prepared from polyelectrolytes with lower solubilities in water resisted disassembly at high salt concentrations, and their merge rate was slow. These observations suggest that the hydrophobic segments in polyelectrolytes interfere with the formation of complex coacervates; however, following coacervate formation, the hydrophobic segments render the coacervates stable and elastic.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.