Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39147783›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

Dose-response relationship between computerized cognitive training and cognitive improvement.

Liyang Liu, Haibo Wang, Yi Xing, Ziheng Zhang, Qingge Zhang, Ming Dong, Zhujiang Ma, Longjun Cai, Xiaoyi Wang, Yi Tang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07788209 (Scaffolding in AI-Empowered Cognitive Training Improves Outcomes in Cognitive Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07788209 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Scaffolding in AI-Empowered Cognitive Training Improves Outcomes in Cognitive Impairment: A Real-world Retrospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorXuanwu Hospital, BeijingRan2026 to 2027Enrolled516ConditionsCognitive ImpairmentArmsAI-Based Adaptive CCT Optimized for Cognitive Improvement, AI-Based Adaptive CCT Optimized for Cognitive Performance, Conventional Non-AI CCT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Effect of Multi-Modal Training in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liyang Liu *Department of Neurology & Innovation Center for Neurological Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing, China.
Haibo Wang *Clinical Research Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4726-8939
Yi XingDepartment of Neurology & Innovation Center for Neurological Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing, China.
Ziheng ZhangBeijing Wispirit Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Qingge ZhangBeijing Wispirit Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Ming DongBeijing Wispirit Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Zhujiang MaBeijing Wispirit Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Longjun CaiBeijing Wispirit Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Xiaoyi WangBeijing Wispirit Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Yi TangDepartment of Neurology & Innovation Center for Neurological Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing, China. tangyi@xwhosp.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8052-065X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although computerized cognitive training (CCT) is an effective digital intervention for cognitive impairment, its dose-response relationship is understudied. This retrospective cohort study explores the association between training dose and cognitive improvement to find the optimal CCT dose. From 2017 to 2022, 8,709 participants with subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, and mild dementia were analyzed. CCT exposure varied in daily dose and frequency, with cognitive improvement measured weekly using Cognitive Index. A mixed-effects model revealed significant Cognitive Index increases across most dose groups before reaching the optimal dose. For participants under 60 years, the optimal dose was 25 to <30 min per day for 6 days a week. For those 60 years or older, it was 50 to <55 min per day for 6 days a week. These findings highlight a dose-dependent effect in CCT, suggesting age-specific optimal dosing for cognitive improvement.

Identifiers

PMID39147783
PMCPMC11327304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.