Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39147703›Full record

ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2024

[Chinese Expert Consensus on Perioperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation Training 
for Lung Cancer].

Lung Cancer Specialty Committee of Chinese Elderly Health Care Association, Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Specialty Committee of Sichuan Province Rehabilitation Medical Association, Lung Rehabilitation Specialty Committee of Chengdu Rehabilitation Medical Association

Abstract readEnglish AbstractConsensus Statement
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lung Cancer Specialty Committee of Chinese Elderly Health Care Association
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Specialty Committee of Sichuan Province Rehabilitation Medical Association
Lung Rehabilitation Specialty Committee of Chengdu Rehabilitation Medical Association

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation may effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and improve the quality of life of lung cancer patients and its clinical application value in lung cancer patients has been widely recognized. However, there is still no international consensus or guideline for pulmonary rehabilitation regimen, lacking standardized criteria when pulmonary rehabilitation applied in perioperative clinical practice for lung cancer. The consensus provides implementation regimen and process of pulmonary rehabilitation, aiming to promote the reasonable and standardized application of perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation training in clinical practice, sequentially enable patients to maximize benefits from the rehabilitation.
.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsRespiratory TherapyChinaConsensusHumansPerioperative CareExpert consensusLung neoplasmsPerioperative pulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39147703
PMCPMC11331257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.