ArticleJournal of pediatric urology2024
Identification of urological anomalies associated with anorectal malformation in southwestern Uganda: Limitations and opportunities.
Article in Journal of pediatric urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAnorectal malformations (ARMs) may be associated with congenital anomalies affecting other body parts namely vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, tracheoesophageal, renal, and limb (VACTERL) with varying incidences of 7%-60% . Genitourinary defects might occur approximately in 50% of all patients with anorectal malformations hence patients should be evaluated from birth to rule out these defects.
objectiveTo identify urological anomalies associated with anorectal malformation in southwestern Uganda. STUDY
designThis was a descriptive retrospective cohort study conducted at our regional referral hospital in Southwestern Uganda involving patients who have undergone surgical correction of ARMs between June 2021 and July 2023.
resultsThe overall prevalence of renal anomalies in our study patient population was 18.05%. Of those with ARM-associated renal anomalies, Specific anomalies included; renal agenesis (6.8%), hydronephrosis, (4.5%), duplex collecting system (3.8%), crossed fused kidney (1.5%), and ectopic kidney (0.75%). (Table) DISCUSSION: We found that the prevalence of ARM-associated renal anomalies was 18.05%, and the commonest anomaly was unilateral agenesis (6.8%) similar to other studies. Previous data have shown renal anomalies are common anomalies in ARM. While the exact values vary across studies, they all concluded that the rate of associated anomalies is extremely high in ARMs and warrants a thorough preoperative investigation once the ARMs are detected. This finding therefore underscores the importance of thorough evaluation and a multidisciplinary approach of care and follow-up system for ARM management including urologists even when the children are asymptomatic now. The main limitation of our study was missing information on patients' charts, we were not able to get the diagnosis since most patients didn't have their discharge forms at the time of evaluation.
conclusionARM associated with renal anomalies may remain undiagnosed and asymptomatic. Those identified as asymptomatic need to be followed in a multidisciplinary fashion including pediatric urologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.