Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39147367›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2024

Prenatal Care Clinician Preferences Among Patients With Spanish-Preferred Language.

Haylie M Butler, Maria Bazan, Luis Rivera, Kevin E Salinas, Michele R Hacker, Sophia DeLevie-Orey, Molly R Siegel, Elysia Larson, Rose L Molina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haylie M ButlerHarvard Medical School, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú.
Maria Bazan
Luis Rivera
Kevin E Salinas
Michele R Hacker
Sophia DeLevie-Orey
Molly R Siegel
Elysia Larson
Rose L Molina

Funding

Reducing Racial Disparities in SMM post COVID19: Assessing the integration of maternal safety bundles and community based doulas to improve outcomes for Black womenR01MD016026 · NIMHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI AMUTAH-ONUKAGHA, NDIDIAMAKA, DECLERCQ, EUGENE R · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
Developing and testing a multi-component intervention to improve Perinatal Mental HealthK01MH133966 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI LARSON, ELYSIA · 2023 to 2025
$704k
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Office of Scholarly Engagement, Harvard Medical School K12HS026370AHRQ HHS K12 HS026370NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD016026NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH133966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo measure what patients with Spanish language preference and limited English proficiency value most when selecting a prenatal care clinician.

methodsA discrete choice experiment was administered at two large academic medical centers in Boston, Massachusetts. Participants were identified by electronic medical record, had preferred Spanish language and self-identified limited English proficiency, and either were pregnant with a completed fetal anatomy scan or had given birth within the past 12 months at the time of the study. The discrete choice experiment consisted of eight attributes to consider when selecting a prenatal care clinician: clinician Spanish proficiency, type of interpreter used, interpersonal dynamics (ie, making patients feel seen, heard, and cared for), cultural concordance, continuity of care, shared decision making, distance from home, and wait times for appointments. Descriptive statistics of demographic variables were calculated. Hierarchical Bayesian models were used to analyze discrete choice experiment data.

resultsThe attributes that were most important to 166 participants when choosing their prenatal care clinician were interpersonal dynamics within the patient-clinician dyad and clinician Spanish language proficiency (average importance 21.4/100 and 20.8/100, respectively). Of lowest importance were wait time to receive an appointment and continuity of care (average importance 5.1 and 6.1, respectively). Although participants highly preferred that their clinician be "fluent or near fluent in Spanish," the second most preferred option was having a clinician with only basic Spanish proficiency rather than a more advanced level of Spanish proficiency with some misunderstandings.

conclusionOur study demonstrates the importance of positive clinician-patient interpersonal dynamics and language-concordant care for patients with Spanish language preference in prenatal care. Promoting equitable patient-centered care for patients with limited English proficiency requires responding to preferences regarding clinician language proficiency and demonstrating attentiveness, empathy, and concern for prenatal care experiences.

Indexed as

Patient PreferencePhysician-Patient RelationsPrenatal CareAdultBostonChoice BehaviorFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansLanguageLimited English ProficiencyPregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39147367
PMCPMC12118539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.