ArticleMicrovascular research2024
Structured adaptive boosting trees for detection of multicellular aggregates in fluorescence intravital microscopy.
Article in Microvascular research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating retrieval-augmented generation for enhanced personalized physician recommendations in web-based medical services: model development study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescence intravital microscopy captures large data sets of dynamic multicellular interactions within various organs such as the lungs, liver, and brain of living subjects. In medical imaging, edge detection is used to accurately identify and delineate important structures and boundaries inside the images. To improve edge sharpness, edge detection frequently requires the inclusion of low-level features. Herein, a machine learning approach is needed to automate the edge detection of multicellular aggregates of distinctly labeled blood cells within the microcirculation. In this work, the Structured Adaptive Boosting Trees algorithm (AdaBoost.S) is proposed as a contribution to overcome some of the edge detection challenges related to medical images. Algorithm design is based on the observation that edges over an image mask often exhibit special structures and are interdependent. Such structures can be predicted using the features extracted from a bigger image patch that covers the image edge mask. The proposed AdaBoost.S is applied to detect multicellular aggregates within blood vessels from the fluorescence lung intravital images of mice exposed to e-cigarette vapor. The predictive capabilities of this approach for detecting platelet-neutrophil aggregates within the lung blood vessels are evaluated against three conventional machine learning algorithms: Random Forest, XGBoost and Decision Tree. AdaBoost.S exhibits a mean recall, F-score, and precision of 0.81, 0.79, and 0.78, respectively. Compared to all three existing algorithms, AdaBoost.S has statistically better performance for recall and F-score. Although AdaBoost.S does not outperform Random Forest in precision, it remains superior to the XGBoost and Decision Tree algorithms. The proposed AdaBoost.S is widely applicable to analysis of other fluorescence intravital microscopy applications including cancer, infection, and cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.