Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39147116›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2025

Longitudinal Follow-up of Medicare Patients After Esophageal Cancer Resection in the STS Database.

Justin D Blasberg, Elliot Servais, Dylan Thibault, Jeffrey P Jacobs, Benjamin Kozower, Elizabeth David, James Donahue, Andrew Vekstein, Lillian Kang, Matthew Hartwig and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Justin D BlasbergDepartment of Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: justin.blasberg@yale.edu.
Elliot ServaisDepartment of Surgery, Lahey Hospital, Burlington, Massachusetts.
Dylan ThibaultDuke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Jeffrey P JacobsUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Benjamin KozowerDepartment of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Elizabeth DavidDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
James DonahueDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
Andrew VeksteinDuke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Lillian KangDuke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew HartwigDuke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Leigh Ann JonesSociety of Thoracic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois.
Andrzej KosinskiDuke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Robert HabibSociety of Thoracic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois.
Christopher ToweDepartment of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Christopher W SederDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding characteristics associated with survival after esophagectomy for cancer is critical to preoperative risk stratification. This study sought to define predictors for long-term survival after esophagectomy for cancer in Medicare patients.

methodsThe Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database was queried for patients aged ≥65 years who underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2020 and linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data using a deterministic matching algorithm. Patient, hospital, and treatment variables were assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate characteristics associated with long-term mortality and readmission. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence curves were generated and differences evaluated using the log-rank test and Gray's test, respectively.

resultsAfter CMS linkage, 4798 patients were included. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality in the study group was 3.84% and 7.45%, respectively. In the multivariable model, American Society of Anesthesiologists score >3, body mass index >35, and diabetes were associated with increased mortality <90 days post-surgery, while pN/pT upstaging was associated with increased mortality >90 days post-surgery. Patients upstaged to pN(+) had a 147% increased mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.47; 95% CI, 2.02-3.02) and those that remained pN(+) a 75% increased mortality risk (aHR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.57-1.95) compared with downstaged patients. Patients who were pT upstaged had a 109% (aHR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.73-2.53) increased mortality risk compared with pT downstaged patients. Risk for readmission was independent of procedure type or approach and was higher in c stage ≥2, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥4, and pN+.

conclusionsMedicare patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer have identifiable patient-specific predictors for short-term mortality and tumor-specific predictors for long-term mortality and readmission. In the absence of pathologic T and N downstaging, risk for long-term mortality and readmission are increased.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyMedicareAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.