Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39146974›Full record

SynthesisArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2024

Revolutionizing early Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment diagnosis: a deep learning MRI meta-analysis.

Li-Xue Wang, Yi-Zhe Wang, Chen-Guang Han, Lei Zhao, Li He, Jie Li

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li-Xue WangBeijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Department of Radiology, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8368-5513
Yi-Zhe WangBeijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Department of Radiology, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1915-0186
Chen-Guang HanTsinghua University, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0001-6746-6003
Lei ZhaoBeijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Department of Radiology, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0001-3290-9898
Li HeBeijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Department of Radiology, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0004-1530-0564
Jie LiBeijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Department of Radiology, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-2410-8764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains a significant challenge in neurology, with conventional methods often limited by subjectivity and variability in interpretation. Integrating deep learning with artificial intelligence (AI) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis emerges as a transformative approach, offering the potential for unbiased, highly accurate diagnostic insights.

objectiveA meta-analysis was designed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning of MRI images on AD and MCI models.

methodsA meta-analysis was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning. Subsequently, methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 checklist. Diagnostic measures, including sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were analyzed, alongside subgroup analyses for T1-weighted and non-T1-weighted MRI.

resultsA total of 18 eligible studies were identified. The Spearman correlation coefficient was -0.6506. Meta-analysis showed that the combined sensitivity and specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.84, 0.86, 6.0, 0.19, and 32, respectively. The AUROC was 0.92. The quiescent point of hierarchical summary of receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) was 3.463. Notably, the images of 12 studies were acquired by T1-weighted MRI alone, and those of the other 6 were gathered by non-T1-weighted MRI alone.

conclusionOverall, deep learning of MRI for the diagnosis of AD and MCI showed good sensitivity and specificity and contributed to improving diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityEarly DiagnosisHumansROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID39146974
PMCPMC11500276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.