ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024
Giant urinary bladder stone: A rare case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Giant bladder stone presenting with renal failure 15 years after ileocystoplasty augmentation: A case report.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- A forgotten disease revisited: giant bladder stone in a modern clinical setting case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Giant Bladder Calculus Presenting as A Rare Cause of Renal Impairment in A Young Adult with Substance Use Disorder.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2026Article
- Open Cystolithotomy Under Local Anesthesia in a High-Risk Patient With a Giant Bladder Stone and Unilateral Lung Collapse: A Case Report.Case reports in urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGiant urinary bladder stones are rare phenomenon which is associated with chronic urinary infections, intravesical foreign bodies, urethral strictures, bladder diverticula etc. CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old man presented with complaints of severe dysuria, urgency, frequency, suprapubic pain, and pollakuria for the last ten years. Physical examination revealed a palpable suprapubic mass with no obvious flank masses. Ultrasonography of the abdomen and pelvis revealed right-sided gross hydroureteronephrosis and thinning of renal parenchyma along with a hyperechoic structure with posterior acoustic shadowing was noted in the region of the urinary bladder, suggesting a vesical calculus. Plain CT of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (KUB) confirmed right nephrolithiasis in lower poly calyx and a large vesical calculus (10.6 cm × 8.6 cm x8.8 cm, +1110 HU). Open cystolithotomy with a right-sided double-J "DJ" stent insertion was performed. Post-operative period went uneventful. DISCUSSION: Giant bladder stones are extremely rare, often resulting from neglected symptoms in otherwise normal individuals. They typically develop over several years and present with symptoms like severe dysuria, urgency, frequency, supra-pubic pain, and hematuria. Diagnosis is made by cystoscopy, ultrasonography and CT-KUB. Treatment includes intracorporeal cystolithotripsy using a laser, ultrasonic lithotripter, or pneumatic lithotripter, depending on availability. Endourologic procedures have been safer and more cost-effective for bladder stones, however, open removal is the treatment of choice for giant bladder stones.
conclusionOpen cystolithotomy can be performed to remove giant bladder stone with near 100 % stone removal rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.