Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39146364›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2024

Cytomegalovirus inhibitors of programmed cell death restrict antigen cross-presentation in the priming of antiviral CD8 T cells.

Stefan Ebert, Verena Böhm, Julia K Büttner, Wolfram Brune, Melanie M Brinkmann, Rafaela Holtappels, Matthias J Reddehase, Niels A W Lemmermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefan EbertInstitute for Virology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Verena BöhmInstitute for Virology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Julia K BüttnerInstitute for Virology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Wolfram BruneLeibniz Institute of Virology (LIV), Hamburg, Germany.
Melanie M BrinkmannInstitute of Genetics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Rafaela HoltappelsInstitute for Virology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Matthias J ReddehaseInstitute for Virology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Niels A W LemmermannInstitute for Virology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9190-6497

Funding

Clinical Research Group BR 1730/7-1Cluster of Excellence ImmunoSensation EXC2151Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Collaborative Research Center (CRC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD8 T cells are the predominant effector cells of adaptive immunity in preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) multiple-organ disease caused by cytopathogenic tissue infection. The mechanism by which CMV-specific, naïve CD8 T cells become primed and clonally expand is of fundamental importance for our understanding of CMV immune control. For CD8 T-cell priming, two pathways have been identified: direct antigen presentation by infected professional antigen-presenting cells (pAPCs) and antigen cross-presentation by uninfected pAPCs that take up antigenic material derived from infected tissue cells. Studies in mouse models using murine CMV (mCMV) and precluding either pathway genetically or experimentally have shown that, in principle, both pathways can congruently generate the mouse MHC/H-2 class-I-determined epitope-specificity repertoire of the CD8 T-cell response. Recent studies, however, have shown that direct antigen presentation is the canonical pathway when both are accessible. This raised the question of why antigen cross-presentation is ineffective even under conditions of high virus replication thought to provide high amounts of antigenic material for feeding cross-presenting pAPCs. As delivery of antigenic material for cross-presentation is associated with programmed cell death, and as CMVs encode inhibitors of different cell death pathways, we pursued the idea that these inhibitors restrict antigen delivery and thus CD8 T-cell priming by cross-presentation. To test this hypothesis, we compared the CD8 T-cell responses to recombinant mCMVs lacking expression of the apoptosis-inhibiting protein M36 or the necroptosis-inhibiting protein M45 with responses to wild-type mCMV and revertant viruses expressing the respective cell death inhibitors. The data reveal that increased programmed cell death improves CD8 T-cell priming in mice capable of antigen cross-presentation but not in a mutant mouse strain unable to cross-present. These findings strongly support the conclusion that CMV cell death inhibitors restrict the priming of CD8 T cells by antigen cross-presentation.

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCross-PrimingCytomegalovirus InfectionsAnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsAntigens, ViralApoptosisCytomegalovirusMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuromegalovirusAntigens, Viral

Identifiers

PMID39146364
PMCPMC11349235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.