Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39146349›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Supporting the working life exposome: Annotating occupational exposure for enhanced literature search.

Paul Thompson, Sophia Ananiadou, Ioannis Basinas, Bendik C Brinchmann, Christine Cramer, Karen S Galea, Calvin Ge, Panagiotis Georgiadis, Jorunn Kirkeleit, Eelco Kuijpers and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Paul ThompsonDepartment of Computer Science, National Centre for Text Mining, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-5319-739X
Sophia AnaniadouDepartment of Computer Science, National Centre for Text Mining, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Ioannis BasinasCentre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7708-3017
Bendik C BrinchmannFederation of Norwegian Industries, Oslo, Norway.
Christine CramerDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for Environment, Occupation and Health, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7873-435X
Karen S GaleaInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9540-8513
Calvin GeNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Panagiotis GeorgiadisDepartment of Computer Science, National Centre for Text Mining, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jorunn KirkeleitFederation of Norwegian Industries, Oslo, Norway.
Eelco KuijpersNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Nhung NguyenDepartment of Computer Science, National Centre for Text Mining, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Roberto NuñezOccupational Health Group, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9000-6574
Vivi SchlünssenDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for Environment, Occupation and Health, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Zara Ann StokholmDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Evana Amir TaherCenter for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden.
Håkan TinnerbergSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Martie Van TongerenCentre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Qianqian XieDepartment of Computer Science, National Centre for Text Mining, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An individual's likelihood of developing non-communicable diseases is often influenced by the types, intensities and duration of exposures at work. Job exposure matrices provide exposure estimates associated with different occupations. However, due to their time-consuming expert curation process, job exposure matrices currently cover only a subset of possible workplace exposures and may not be regularly updated. Scientific literature articles describing exposure studies provide important supporting evidence for developing and updating job exposure matrices, since they report on exposures in a variety of occupational scenarios. However, the constant growth of scientific literature is increasing the challenges of efficiently identifying relevant articles and important content within them. Natural language processing methods emulate the human process of reading and understanding texts, but in a fraction of the time. Such methods can increase the efficiency of both finding relevant documents and pinpointing specific information within them, which could streamline the process of developing and updating job exposure matrices. Named entity recognition is a fundamental natural language processing method for language understanding, which automatically identifies mentions of domain-specific concepts (named entities) in documents, e.g., exposures, occupations and job tasks. State-of-the-art machine learning models typically use evidence from an annotated corpus, i.e., a set of documents in which named entities are manually marked up (annotated) by experts, to learn how to detect named entities automatically in new documents. We have developed a novel annotated corpus of scientific articles to support machine learning based named entity recognition relevant to occupational substance exposures. Through incremental refinements to the annotation process, we demonstrate that expert annotators can attain high levels of agreement, and that the corpus can be used to train high-performance named entity recognition models. The corpus thus constitutes an important foundation for the wider development of natural language processing tools to support the study of occupational exposures.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingOccupational ExposureExposomeHumansOccupations

Identifiers

PMID39146349
PMCPMC11326626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.