ArticlePloS one2024
Engineering receptor-binding domain and heptad repeat domains towards the development of multi-epitopes oral vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inability of existing vaccines to cope with the mutation rate has highlighted the need for effective preventative strategies for COVID-19. Through the secretion of immunoglobulin A, mucosal delivery of vaccines can effectively stimulate mucosal immunity for better protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this study, various immunoinformatic tools were used to design a multi-epitope oral vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 based on its receptor-binding domain (RBD) and heptad repeat (HR) domains. T and B lymphocyte epitopes were initially predicted from the RBD and HR domains of SARS-CoV-2, and potential antigenic, immunogenic, non-allergenic, and non-toxic epitopes were identified. Epitopes that are highly conserved and have no significant similarity to human proteome were selected. The epitopes were joined with appropriate linkers, and an adjuvant was added to enhance the vaccine efficacy. The vaccine 3D structure constructs were docked with toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) and TLR1-TLR2, and the binding affinity was calculated. The designed multi-epitope vaccine construct (MEVC) consisted of 33 antigenic T and B lymphocyte epitopes. The results of molecular dockings and free binding energies confirmed that the MEVC effectively binds to TLR molecules, and the complexes were stable. The results suggested that the designed MEVC is a potentially safe and effective oral vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. This in silico study presents a novel approach for creating an oral multi-epitope vaccine against the rapidly evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. These findings offer valuable insights for developing an effective strategy to combat COVID-19. Further preclinical and clinical studies are required to confirm the efficacy of the MEVC vaccine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.