Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39146294›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Adoptability of digital payments for community health workers in peri-urban Uganda: A case study of Wakiso district.

Veronica Kembabazi, Arnold Tigaiza, Charles Opio, Juliet Aweko, Mary Nakafeero, Fredrick Edward Makumbi, Michael Ediau, Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho, Andrew K Tusubira, Peter Waiswa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Veronica KembabaziDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0009-0007-4438-1406
Arnold TigaizaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Charles OpioDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Juliet AwekoDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Mary NakafeeroMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Fredrick Edward MakumbiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Michael EdiauDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Elizabeth Ekirapa KirachoDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Andrew K TusubiraDepartment of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Peter WaiswaMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhereas digital payments have been identified as a solution to health payment challenges, evidence on their adoptability among Community Health Workers (CHWs) is limited. Understanding their adoptability is crucial for sustainability. This study assessed the adoptability of digital payments for CHWs in Wakiso district, Uganda.

methodsA convergent parallel mixed-methods study was conducted between November and December 2022, in Wakiso district, Uganda. We surveyed a random sample of 150 CHWs using a structured questionnaire and conducted key informant interviews among three purposively selected Digital payment coordinators. The study utilized the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework to assess the adoptability of digital payments among CHWs. Factor analysis was performed to extract composite variables from the original constituting variables. Using the median, the outcome was converted to a binary variable and logistic regression was conducted to assess the association between the TAM constructs and adoptability of digital payments by CHWs. Quantitative data was analyzed using STATA 14, while qualitative data was transcribed verbatim and analyzed using ATLAS.ti 22.

resultsNearly all participants (98.0%; n = 49) had previously received payments through mobile money, a digital payment method. (52%; n = 78) of CHWs said they intend to use digital payment modalities. Perceived risk of digital payments was associated with 83% lower odds of adoptability of digital payment modalities (OR = 0.17;95%CI:0.052, 0.54), while perceived trust had nearly three times higher odds of adoptability of digital payment modalities (OR = 2.82;95%CI:1.41, 5.67). Qualitative interviews showed that most CHWs reported positive experiences with digital health payments, including effectiveness and completeness of payments except for delays associated with mobile money payments across payment providers. Mobile money was reported to be easy to use, in addition to fostering financial responsibility compared to cash.

conclusionCHWs in Wakiso district intend to use digital payment modalities, particularly mobile money/e-cash. Perceived risk of the payment method and trust are key determinants of adoptability. Synergized efforts by both payment providers to manage payment delays and mitigate risks associated with digital payments could attenuate perceived risk and build trust in digital payment modalities.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUganda

Identifiers

PMID39146294
PMCPMC11326584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.