ArticlePLOS global public health2024
The use of the WHO criteria to detect severe malaria among patients clinically diagnosed with uncomplicated malaria.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Memory regulatory T cells reprogram into protective TNature immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) strict defining criteria were used to identify severe malaria among Ghanaian patients clinically diagnosed as uncomplicated malaria. From each study participant, blood haemoglobin (Hb) and plasma bilirubin levels were estimated using automated analyzers. According to the WHO, the criteria for diagnosing severe malaria among children (< 12 years) was assessed using Hb < 5 g/dL and among other patients ≥ 12 years, Hb < 7 g/dL with parasitemia > 10,000/μL, plasma bilirubin > 50 μmol/L amidst parasitemia > 100,000/μL and P. falciparum hyperparasitaemia (> 500,000 parasites/μL). Patients initially diagnosed with asymptomatic malaria (n = 347) were recruited. The parasitemia range was 540-863,402 parasite/μL. Overall, 86.2% of the patients had uncomplicated malaria while 13.8% of the patients were diagnosed with severe malaria of various origins. In children < 12 years, 10.8% (17/157) had Hb < 5g/dL with parasitaemia < 10,000 parasites/μL and in other patients (≥ 12 years), 6.3% (12/190) of them recorded Hb < 7g/dL with parasitaemia < 10,000 parasites/μL. Furthermore, 13.8% (48/347) had serum bilirubin levels > 50 μmol/L with parasitemia > 100,000/μL. In all the patients with hyperbilirubinemia, Hb levels fell below either 5g/dL or 7g/dL, for patients less than and 12 years or more, respectively. Finally, 1.7% (6/347) of the patients with malaria had parasite counts (> 500,000 parasites/μL). Irrespective of the etiology, patients diagnosed with severe malaria presented with pallor, vomiting, diarrhea, chills, fever and nausea, concurrently. Without comprehensive laboratory evaluation, patients with severe malaria could be misdiagnosed. Therefore, healthcare facilities need adequate human and logistical resources to be able to diagnose severe malaria for appropriate management to avert any untoward outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.