Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39146233›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

A guide for the generation of repositories of clinical samples for research on Chagas disease.

Nieves Martínez-Peinado, Juan Carlos Gabaldón-Figueira, Roberto Rodrigues Ferreira, María Carmen Thomas, Manuel Carlos López, Tania Cremonini Araújo-Jorge, Belkisyolé Alarcón de Noya, Soledad Berón, Janine Ramsey, Irene Losada Galván and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Nieves Martínez-PeinadoBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan Carlos Gabaldón-FigueiraBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Roberto Rodrigues FerreiraLaboratory of Innovations in Therapies, Education and Bioproducts, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (LITEB-IOC/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
María Carmen ThomasInstituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina López Neyra, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPBLN-CSIC), PTS-Granada, Granada, Spain.
Manuel Carlos LópezInstituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina López Neyra, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPBLN-CSIC), PTS-Granada, Granada, Spain.
Tania Cremonini Araújo-JorgeLaboratory of Innovations in Therapies, Education and Bioproducts, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (LITEB-IOC/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Belkisyolé Alarcón de NoyaInstituto de Medicina Tropical, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.
Soledad BerónFundación Mundo Sano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Janine RamseyCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP), Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, México.
Irene Losada GalvánBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandro Gabriel SchijmanLaboratorio de Biología Molecular de la Enfermedad de Chagas, Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular "Dr. Héctor N. Torres" - INGEBI-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Adriana González MartínezDepartamento de Investigación, Salvando Latidos A.C., Guadalajara, Mexico.
Andrés Mariano RuizInstituto Nacional de Parasitología "Dr Mario Fatala Chaben" ANLIS MALBRÁN, Ministerio de Salud, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gimena RojasUniversidad Mayor de San Simón and Fundación CEADES, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Roberto Magalhães SaraivaEvandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Oscar Noya-GonzálezInstituto de Medicina Tropical, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.
Andrea GómezFundación Mundo Sano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rosa A MaldonadoDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America.
Jimmy PintoUniversidad Mayor de San Simón and Fundación CEADES, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Faustino TorricoUniversidad Mayor de San Simón and Fundación CEADES, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Ivan ScandaleDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Fernán AgüeroInstituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas (IIB)-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María-Jesús PinazoDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Joaquim GascónBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandro Marcel Hasslocher-MorenoEvandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Julio Alonso-PadillaBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4466-7969
NHEPACHA Network (New Tools for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Chagas Disease)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chagas disease, caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, affects over 6 million people, mainly in Latin America. Two different clinical phases, acute and chronic, are recognised. Currently, 2 anti-parasitic drugs are available to treat the disease (nifurtimox and benznidazole), but diagnostic methods require of a relatively complex infrastructure and trained personnel, limiting its widespread use in endemic areas, and the access of patients to treatment. New diagnostic methods, such as rapid tests (RDTs) to diagnose chronic Chagas disease, or loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), to detect acute infections, represent valuable alternatives, but the parasite's remarkable genetic diversity might make its implementation difficult. Furthermore, determining the efficacy of Chagas disease treatment is complicated, given the slow reversion of serological anti-T. cruzi antibody reactivity, which may even take decades to occur. New biomarkers to evaluate early therapeutic efficacy, as well as diagnostic tests able to detect the wide variety of circulating genotypes, are therefore, urgently required. To carry out studies that address these needs, high-quality and traceable samples from T. cruzi-infected individuals with different geographical backgrounds, along with associated clinical and epidemiological data, are necessary. This work describes the framework for the creation of such repositories, following standardised and uniform protocols, and considering the ethical, technical, and logistic aspects of the process. The manual can be adapted according to the resources of each laboratory, to guarantee that samples are obtained in a reproducible way, favouring the exchange of data among different work groups, and their generalizable evaluation and analysis. The main objective of this is to accelerate the development of new diagnostic methods and the identification of biomarkers for Chagas disease.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseTrypanosoma cruziBiological Specimen BanksHumansNucleic Acid Amplification Techniques

Identifiers

PMID39146233
PMCPMC11326570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.