Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39145912›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2024

Management of Toxicities Associated with BCMA, GPRC5D, and FcRH5-Targeting Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma.

Darren Pan, Joshua Richter

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated with T-Cell Engager Therapy.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. T-Cell Engagers In Multiple Myeloma: A Clinical Review.Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Darren PanTisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Joshua RichterTisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY, 10029, USA. Joshua.Richter@mountsinai.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe introduction of bispecific antibodies is one of the most significant recent advances in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. This review will summarize the management of the toxicities associated with newly approved T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies and those which may be approved in the near future. RECENT

findingsNumerous trials have shown that bispecific antibodies can be both effective and tolerable when adverse events are properly managed. Cytokine release syndrome and increased infections are observed across all bispecific antibodies. Additional adverse events are target-specific, such as the more severe hypogammaglobulinemia and infections of BCMA bispecific antibodies and the dysgeusia, nail dystrophy, and skin changes of GPRC5D bispecific antibodies. Bispecific antibodies will surely become a mainstay of multiple myeloma therapy given their efficacy and accessibility. Their unique toxicities must be carefully considered and managed to ensure they are utilized safely.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificB-Cell Maturation AntigenMultiple MyelomaReceptors, FcReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalHumansAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB-Cell Maturation AntigenFCRL5 protein, humanGPRC5D protein, humanReceptors, FcReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledTNFRSF17 protein, humanCevostamabCytokine Release SyndromeICANSTalquetamabTeclistamab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.