Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39145896›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2024

Mixed Reality in the Operating Room: A Systematic Review.

Renato Magalhães, Ana Oliveira, David Terroso, Adélio Vilaça, Rita Veloso, António Marques, Javier Pereira, Luís Coelho

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07243808 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Mixed Reality and Ultrasound Localization Techniques for Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsSurgical Stabilization of Rib Fracture
NCT07648056 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effectiveness of Mixed Reality Versus Traditional Simulation in Arthroscopic Surgical Training: A Parallel-Group Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade da CoruñaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled25ConditionsSurgical Education, Clinical CompetenceArmsTraditional Simulator Training, Mixed Reality Simulator Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and Clinical Feasibility of a Computer-Assisted Shape Design and Bending System for Spinal Fixation Rods.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mixed reality improves agreement on surgical approach selection and patient positioning in tibial plateau fracture planning compared to CT, 3DCT and 3D printing.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The evolution of cardiothoracic surgery training: from apprenticeship to AI-assisted simulation.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Usefulness of Mixed Reality in Surgical Treatment: Delphi Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. [Application of poly ether ether ketone localization marker combined with mixed reality technology in vessel localization of anterolateral thigh perforator flap].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Renato MagalhãesLabRP-CIR, ESS, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal. rfm@ess.ipp.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8488-0943
Ana OliveiraISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal.
David TerrosoISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal.
Adélio VilaçaCAC ICBAS-CHP - Centro Académico Clínico Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar - Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7470-9168
Rita VelosoLabRP-CIR, ESS, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9551-739X
António MarquesLabRP-CIR, ESS, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8656-5023
Javier PereiraUniversidade da Coruña, CITIC Research Center, Talionis Research Group. A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9328-0723
Luís CoelhoISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5673-7306

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/05210/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed Reality is a technology that has gained attention due to its unique capabilities for accessing and visualizing information. When integrated with voice control mechanisms, gestures and even iris movement, it becomes a valuable tool for medicine. These features are particularly appealing for the operating room and surgical learning, where access to information and freedom of hand operation are fundamental. This study examines the most significant research on mixed reality in the operating room over the past five years, to identify the trends, use cases, its applications and limitations. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to answer the research questions established using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome) framework. Although implementation of Mixed Reality applications in the operations room presents some challenges, when used appropriately, it can yield remarkable results. It can make learning easier, flatten the learning curve for several procedures, and facilitate various aspects of the surgical processes. The articles' conclusions highlight the potential benefits of these innovations in surgical practice while acknowledging the challenges that must be addressed. Technical complexity, equipment costs, and steep learning curves present significant obstacles to the widespread adoption of Mixed Reality and computer-assisted evaluation. The need for more flexible approaches and comprehensive studies is underscored by the specificity of procedures and limited samples sizes. The integration of imaging modalities and innovative functionalities holds promise for clinical applications. However, it is important to consider issues related to usability, bias, and statistical analyses. Mixed Reality offers significant benefits, but there are still open challenges such as ergonomic issues, limited field of view, and battery autonomy that must be addressed to ensure widespread acceptance.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityOperating RoomsHumansUser-Computer InterfaceExtended reality, augmented realityMedical remote assistanceMixed realityOperating roomsSurgery

Identifiers

PMID39145896
PMCPMC11327191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.