Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39145820›Full record

ReviewNano-micro letters2024

3D-Printed MOF Monoliths: Fabrication Strategies and Environmental Applications.

Hossein Molavi, Kamyar Mirzaei, Mahdi Barjasteh, Seyed Yahya Rahnamaee, Somayeh Saeedi, Aliakbar Hassanpouryouzband, Mashallah Rezakazemi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nano-micro letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Direct Air Capture of COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Sustainable COLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A Perspective on the Applications of Triphasic Gas Storage in Electrochemical Systems.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hossein MolaviDepartment of Chemistry, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Science (IASBS), Zanjan, 45137-66731, Iran. h.molavi@iasbs.ac.ir.
Kamyar MirzaeiDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
Mahdi BarjastehCenter for Nano-Science and Nanotechnology, Institute for Convergence Science & Technology, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, 15614, Iran.
Seyed Yahya RahnamaeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Hafez Ave., P.O.Box 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran.
Somayeh SaeediDepartment of Chemistry, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Science (IASBS), Zanjan, 45137-66731, Iran.
Aliakbar HassanpouryouzbandGrant Institute, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, West Main Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FE, UK.
Mashallah RezakazemiFaculty of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, P.O. Box 3619995161, Iran. mashalah.rezakazemi@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been extensively considered as one of the most promising types of porous and crystalline organic-inorganic materials, thanks to their large specific surface area, high porosity, tailorable structures and compositions, diverse functionalities, and well-controlled pore/size distribution. However, most developed MOFs are in powder forms, which still have some technical challenges, including abrasion, dustiness, low packing densities, clogging, mass/heat transfer limitation, environmental pollution, and mechanical instability during the packing process, that restrict their applicability in industrial applications. Therefore, in recent years, attention has focused on techniques to convert MOF powders into macroscopic materials like beads, membranes, monoliths, gel/sponges, and nanofibers to overcome these challenges.Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has achieved much interest because it can produce many high-resolution macroscopic frameworks with complex shapes and geometries from digital models. Therefore, this review summarizes the combination of different 3D printing strategies with MOFs and MOF-based materials for fabricating 3D-printed MOF monoliths and their environmental applications, emphasizing water treatment and gas adsorption/separation applications. Herein, the various strategies for the fabrication of 3D-printed MOF monoliths, such as direct ink writing, seed-assisted in-situ growth, coordination replication from solid precursors, matrix incorporation, selective laser sintering, and digital light processing, are described with the relevant examples. Finally, future directions and challenges of 3D-printed MOF monoliths are also presented to better plan future trajectories in the shaping of MOF materials with improved control over the structure, composition, and textural properties of 3D-printed MOF monoliths.

Indexed as

3D-printingEnvironmental remediationMOFsMonolithsShaping

Identifiers

PMID39145820
PMCPMC11327240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.