ReviewNano-micro letters2024
3D-Printed MOF Monoliths: Fabrication Strategies and Environmental Applications.
Review in Nano-micro letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct Air Capture of COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Porous Functional Nanomaterials for Continuous Flow Catalysis.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Electrochemical sensor based on iron-based metal-organic framework nanocomposite derived from acid mine drainage for the detection of lead (II) ions in water.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Sustainable COLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026Article
- CFD Mechanistic Modeling of a Monolithic Chromatography System: Challenges and Opportunities.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Bridging MOF properties to 3D printing: a framework for electrochemical energy storage architectures with synergistic porosity-ion dynamics.Chemical science · 2025Review
- [Determination of eight per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in seawater using dispersive membrane extraction-ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2025Article
- A Perspective on the Applications of Triphasic Gas Storage in Electrochemical Systems.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Nanoarchitectonics of Metal-Organic Framework and Nanocellulose Composites for Multifunctional Environmental Remediation.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Advancements and Innovations in Low-Temperature Hydrogen Electrochemical Conversion Devices Driven by 3D Printing Technology.Nano-micro letters · 2025Review
- Polymer-Coordinated Heterogeneous Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 with Exceptional Propylene/Propane Molecular Sieving Effect.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Developing Heterogeneous Porous 3D-Printed SiOPharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Investigation the effect of exchange solvents on the adsorption performances of Ce-MOFs towards organic dyes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in 4D Printing: A Review of Current Smart Materials, Technologies, and Drug Delivery Systems.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Functionalized metal-organic framework and MOF-derived materials for bone regeneration applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Precision-Engineered Construction of Proton-Conducting Metal-Organic Frameworks.Nano-micro letters · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been extensively considered as one of the most promising types of porous and crystalline organic-inorganic materials, thanks to their large specific surface area, high porosity, tailorable structures and compositions, diverse functionalities, and well-controlled pore/size distribution. However, most developed MOFs are in powder forms, which still have some technical challenges, including abrasion, dustiness, low packing densities, clogging, mass/heat transfer limitation, environmental pollution, and mechanical instability during the packing process, that restrict their applicability in industrial applications. Therefore, in recent years, attention has focused on techniques to convert MOF powders into macroscopic materials like beads, membranes, monoliths, gel/sponges, and nanofibers to overcome these challenges.Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has achieved much interest because it can produce many high-resolution macroscopic frameworks with complex shapes and geometries from digital models. Therefore, this review summarizes the combination of different 3D printing strategies with MOFs and MOF-based materials for fabricating 3D-printed MOF monoliths and their environmental applications, emphasizing water treatment and gas adsorption/separation applications. Herein, the various strategies for the fabrication of 3D-printed MOF monoliths, such as direct ink writing, seed-assisted in-situ growth, coordination replication from solid precursors, matrix incorporation, selective laser sintering, and digital light processing, are described with the relevant examples. Finally, future directions and challenges of 3D-printed MOF monoliths are also presented to better plan future trajectories in the shaping of MOF materials with improved control over the structure, composition, and textural properties of 3D-printed MOF monoliths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.