Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39145338›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2023

Adult Attachment and Personal Recovery in Clients With a Psychotic Disorder.

E M M van Bussel, A I Wierdsma, B C van Aken, I E M G Willems, C L Mulder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E M M van BusselGGZ Oost Brabant, Institute for Mental Health, Oss, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8644-0159
A I WierdsmaDepartment of Psychiatry, ESPRI, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
B C van AkenDepartment of Psychiatry, ESPRI, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-7423
I E M G WillemsGGZ Breburg, Institute for Mental Health, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
C L MulderDepartment of Psychiatry, ESPRI, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Personal recovery has become a key objective in the treatment of clients with a psychotic disorder. So far it has been established that the two attachment dimensions, ie, anxious and avoidant, are negatively associated with subjective well-being, self-esteem and hope. This study is the first to explore whether attachment styles are related to personal recovery in this population. Aims: To study the effects of anxious and avoidant attachment on personal recovery in a population with a psychotic disorder. Method: This cross-sectional study is part of the UP's multicenter cohort study on recovery from psychotic disorders, in which 265 participants are currently included. Attachment was assessed using the Psychosis Attachment Measure, including the anxious and avoidant attachment dimensions. Personal recovery was measured using the Recovering Quality of Life-10 (ReQOL-10) and the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC). Regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of attachment on personal recovery. Results: We found negative effects of the anxious attachment style on the total scores of the ReQoL-10 ( Conclusion: Results show that both forms of insecure attachment (anxious and avoidant) are related to poorer personal recovery in clients with a psychotic disorder.

Indexed as

anxious and avoidant attachmentschizophrenia/psychosissubjective recovery

Identifiers

PMID39145338
PMCPMC11207830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.