ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Efficient prediction of anticancer peptides through deep learning.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Animal Venoms as Peptide Libraries for the Discovery of Antiglioblastoma Agents.Biochemistry research international · 2026Review
- Diabetic Foot Ulcers Detection Model Using a Hybrid Convolutional Neural Networks-Vision Transformers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancing clinical biochemistry: addressing gaps and driving future innovations.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality globally, with conventional chemotherapy often resulting in severe side effects and limited effectiveness. Recent advancements in bioinformatics and machine learning, particularly deep learning, offer promising new avenues for cancer treatment through the prediction and identification of anticancer peptides. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning model utilizing a two-dimensional convolutional neural network (2D CNN) to enhance the prediction accuracy of anticancer peptides, addressing the complexities and limitations of current prediction methods. Methods: A diverse dataset of peptide sequences with annotated anticancer activity labels was compiled from various public databases and experimental studies. The sequences were preprocessed and encoded using one-hot encoding and additional physicochemical properties. The 2D CNN model was trained and optimized using this dataset, with performance evaluated through metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Results: The proposed 2D CNN model achieved superior performance compared to existing methods, with an accuracy of 0.87, precision of 0.85, recall of 0.89, F1-score of 0.87, and an AUC-ROC value of 0.91. These results indicate the model's effectiveness in accurately predicting anticancer peptides and capturing intricate spatial patterns within peptide sequences. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the potential of deep learning, specifically 2D CNNs, in advancing the prediction of anticancer peptides. The proposed model significantly improves prediction accuracy, offering a valuable tool for identifying effective peptide candidates for cancer treatment. Future Work: Further research should focus on expanding the dataset, exploring alternative deep learning architectures, and validating the model's predictions through experimental studies. Efforts should also aim at optimizing computational efficiency and translating these predictions into clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.