ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Range aware message drop policy for delay tolerant networks.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In delay tolerant networks (DTNs) the messages are often not delivered to the destination due to a lack of end-to-end connectivity. In such cases, the messages are stored in the buffer for a long time and are transmitted when the nodes come into the range of each other. The buffer size of each node has a limited capacity, and it cannot accommodate the new incoming message when the buffer memory is full, and as a result network congestion occurs. This leads to a low delivery probability and thus increases the overhead ratio. In this research work, a new buffer management scheme called Range Aware Drop (RAD) is proposed which considers metrics such as message size and time to live (TTL). RAD utilizes TTL as an important metric and as a result, reduces the unnecessary message drop. Simulation results reveal that RAD performs significantly better than drop oldest (DOA) and size aware drop (SAD) in terms of delivery probability and overhead ratio. The obtained results also revealed that the hop-count average of SAD is 3.9 and DOA is 3.4 while the hop-count average of RAD is just 1.7. Also, the message drop ratio of the RAD is 36.2% while SAD and DOA have message drop ratios of 73.3% and 84.9% respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.