ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
ProcGCN: detecting malicious process in memory based on DGCNN.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tencent Meeting forensics based on memory reverse analysis.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of memory forensics and deep learning for malware detection has achieved certain progress, but most existing methods convert process dump to images for classification, which is still based on process byte feature classification. After the malware is loaded into memory, the original byte features will change. Compared with byte features, function call features can represent the behaviors of malware more robustly. Therefore, this article proposes the ProcGCN model, a deep learning model based on DGCNN (Deep Graph Convolutional Neural Network), to detect malicious processes in memory images. First, the process dump is extracted from the whole system memory image; then, the Function Call Graph (FCG) of the process is extracted, and feature vectors for the function node in the FCG are generated based on the word bag model; finally, the FCG is input to the ProcGCN model for classification and detection. Using a public dataset for experiments, the ProcGCN model achieved an accuracy of 98.44% and an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.