Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39145231›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

SAMGAT: structure-aware multilevel graph attention networks for automatic rumor detection.

Yafang Li, Zhihua Chu, Caiyan Jia, Baokai Zu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yafang LiFaculty of lnformation Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Zhihua ChuFaculty of lnformation Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Caiyan JiaSchool of Computer and Information Technology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Baokai ZuFaculty of lnformation Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid dissemination of unverified information through social platforms like Twitter poses considerable dangers to societal stability. Identifying real versus fake claims is challenging, and previous work on rumor detection methods often fails to effectively capture propagation structure features. These methods also often overlook the presence of comments irrelevant to the discussion topic of the source post. To address this, we introduce a novel approach: the Structure-Aware Multilevel Graph Attention Network (SAMGAT) for rumor classification. SAMGAT employs a dynamic attention mechanism that blends GATv2 and dot-product attention to capture the contextual relationships between posts, allowing for varying attention scores based on the stance of the central node. The model incorporates a structure-aware attention mechanism that learns attention weights that can indicate the existence of edges, effectively reflecting the propagation structure of rumors. Moreover, SAMGAT incorporates a top-k attention filtering mechanism to select the most relevant neighboring nodes, enhancing its ability to focus on the key structural features of rumor propagation. Furthermore, SAMGAT includes a claim-guided attention pooling mechanism with a thresholding step to focus on the most informative posts when constructing the event representation. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that SAMGAT outperforms state-of-the-art methods in identifying rumors and improves the effectiveness of early rumor detection.

Indexed as

Graph attention networksGraph representation learningRumor detectionSelf-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39145231
PMCPMC11323081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.