ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Enhanced analysis of large-scale news text data using the bidirectional-Kmeans-LSTM-CNN model.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional methods may be inefficient when processing large-scale data in the field of text mining, often struggling to identify and cluster relevant information accurately and efficiently. Additionally, capturing nuanced sentiment and emotional context within news text is challenging with conventional techniques. To address these issues, this article introduces an improved bidirectional-Kmeans-long short-term memory network-convolutional neural network (BiK-LSTM-CNN) model that incorporates emotional semantic analysis for high-dimensional news text visual extraction and media hotspot mining. The BiK-LSTM-CNN model comprises four modules: news text preprocessing, news text clustering, sentiment semantic analysis, and the BiK-LSTM-CNN model itself. By combining these components, the model effectively identifies common features within the input data, clusters similar news articles, and accurately analyzes the emotional semantics of the text. This comprehensive approach enhances both the accuracy and efficiency of visual extraction and hotspot mining. Experimental results demonstrate that compared to models such as Transformer, AdvLSTM, and NewRNN, BiK-LSTM-CNN achieves improvements in macro accuracy by 0.50%, 0.91%, and 1.34%, respectively. Similarly, macro recall rates increase by 0.51%, 1.24%, and 1.26%, while macro F1 scores improve by 0.52%, 1.23%, and 1.92%. Additionally, the BiK-LSTM-CNN model shows significant improvements in time efficiency, further establishing its potential as a more effective approach for processing and analyzing large-scale text data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.