Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39145180›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Study of genotoxic and cytotoxic effects induced in human fibroblasts by exposure to pulsed and continuous 1.6 GHz radiofrequency.

Luca Massaro, Stefania De Sanctis, Valeria Franchini, Elisa Regalbuto, Gaetano Alfano, Chiara Focaccetti, Monica Benvenuto, Loredana Cifaldi, Antonella Sgura, Francesco Berardinelli and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Luca MassaroRadiobiology Section, Defence Center for Biotechnologies, Defence Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Stefania De SanctisRadiobiology Section, Defence Center for Biotechnologies, Defence Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Valeria FranchiniRadiobiology Section, Defence Center for Biotechnologies, Defence Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Elisa RegalbutoRadiobiology Section, Defence Center for Biotechnologies, Defence Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Gaetano AlfanoRadiobiology Section, Defence Center for Biotechnologies, Defence Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Chiara FocaccettiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Monica BenvenutoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Loredana CifaldiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Antonella SguraDepartment of Science, University of Rome "Roma Tre", Rome, Italy.
Francesco BerardinelliDepartment of Science, University of Rome "Roma Tre", Rome, Italy.
Jessica MarinaccioDepartment of Science, University of Rome "Roma Tre", Rome, Italy.
Federica BarbatoDepartment of Science, University of Rome "Roma Tre", Rome, Italy.
Erica RossiDepartment of Science, University of Rome "Roma Tre", Rome, Italy.
Daniela NardoziDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Laura MasuelliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Roberto BeiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Florigio ListaRadiobiology Section, Defence Center for Biotechnologies, Defence Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The widespread use of radiofrequency (RF) sources, ranging from household appliances to telecommunications devices and military equipment, raises concerns among people and regulatory agencies about the potential health risks of RF exposure. Consequently, several Methods: HDF cultures were exposed to continuous and pulsed 1.6 GHz RF, for 2 h, with Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 0.4 W/kg. The potential biological effects of 1.6 GHz RF on HDF were assessed with a multi-methodological approach, analyzing the effects on cell cycle, ultrastructure, protein expression, mitotic spindle, CREST stained micronuclei, chromosome segregation and γ-H2AX/53BP1 foci. Results: 1.6 GHz RF exposure modified proteins expression and morphology of HDF. Specifically, the expression of different heat-shock proteins (HSP) (i.e., HSP-90, HSP-60, and HSP-25) and phospho-AKT were affected. In addition, both continuous and pulsed RF modified the cytoskeletal organization in HDF and increased the number of lysosomes, while the formation of autophagosomes was observed only after pulsed RF exposure. Mitotic spindle anomalies were also found after exposure. However, no significant effect was observed on cell cycle, chromosome segregation, CREST-stained micronuclei and γ-H2AX/53BP1 foci. Conclusion: The results of the present study show the absence of genotoxic damage in 1.6 GHz RF exposed HDF and, although mitotic spindle alterations were observed, they did not have an aneugenic effect. On the other hand, changes in some proteins expression and cell ultrastructure in exposed HDF suggest that RF can potentially induce cell alterations at the morphological and molecular levels.

Indexed as

FibroblastsRadio WavesCell CycleCells, CulturedDNA DamageHumans1.6 GHzbiological effectsEMFgenotoxicitymitotic spindleprotein expressionradiofrequencyultrastructure

Identifiers

PMID39145180
PMCPMC11323689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.