ArticleBiomedicine hub
Bronchoscopy-Guided High-Power Microwave Ablation in an in vivo Porcine Lung Model.
Article in Biomedicine hub. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) is clinically accepted for the treatment of lung tumors and oligometastatic disease. Bronchoscopic MWA is under development and evaluation in the clinical setting. We previously reported on the development of a bronchoscopy-guided MWA system integrated with clinical virtual bronchoscopy and navigation and demonstrated the feasibility of transbronchial MWA, using a maximum power of 60 W at the catheter input. Here, we assessed the performance of bronchoscopy-guided MWA with an improved catheter (maximum power handling of up to 120 W) in normal porcine lung in vivo (as in the previous study). Methods: A total of 8 bronchoscopy-guided MWA were performed ( Results: Bronchoscopy-guided MWA with applied energy levels of 90 W/5 min and 120 W/10 min yielded ablation zones with short-axis diameters in the range of 20-28 mm (56-116% increase) as compared to ∼13 mm from our previous study (60 W/10 min). Histology of higher-power and previous lower-power ablations was consistent, including a central necrotic zone, a thermal fixation zone with intact tissue architecture, and a hemorrhagic periphery. Catheter positioning and its confirmation via intra-procedural 3D imaging (e.g., cone-beam CT) proved to be critical for ablation consistency. Conclusion: Bronchoscopy-guided MWA with an improved catheter designed for maximum power 120 W yields large ablations in normal porcine lung in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.