ArticleTranslational cancer research2024
SCG2 and CPE may be novel markers for the identification of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association rule mining of clinical and biomarker data in neuroendocrine tumors: A prospective study on disease progression.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- An integrated analysis identified mitochondrial ribosomal protein MRPL3 as a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Distinguishing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) from solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) is challenging, primarily due to their overlapping pathological characteristics. To address this, our study aims to identify and validate novel biomarkers that effectively differentiate between these two conditions. We focus on the exploration of new immunohistochemical markers to enhance this distinction. Methods: In this study, we analyzed genetic variations in pNETs and SPNs using the GSE43795 dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Our approach was to identify genes with higher expression in pNETs compared to SPNs and normal pancreatic tissues. We conducted enrichment analyses to understand the functions of these genes. Furthermore, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis was utilized to identify key genes associated with pNETs. Our sample consisted of 163 pancreatic tumor specimens, comprising 78 pNETs and 85 SPNs. We also collected clinicopathological data and used immunohistochemistry to measure the expression levels of these key genes. Results: The enrichment analysis revealed that genes overexpressed in pNETs were mainly involved in signal release, vesicle transport, and ion pathway activation, playing significant roles in endocrine processes like insulin secretion, dopamine synapses, and circadian rhythm regulation. The PPI analysis identified secretogranin II (SCG2), carboxypeptidase E (CPE), and chromogranin A (CgA, CHGA) as key markers for differentiating pNETs from SPNs. Immunohistochemical validation of these markers demonstrated high sensitivity (SCG2: 98.7%, CPE: 97.4%) and specificity (100%), indicating their superior discriminative power compared to traditional markers like CgA, β-catenin, lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1), and vimentin. Conclusions: Our study indicates that SCG2 and CPE are effective, novel immunohistochemical biomarkers for differentiating pNETs from SPNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.