ArticleTranslational cancer research2024
Survival and analysis of prognostic factors for fibroblastic osteosarcoma patients: a population-based study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteosarcoma is the most common mesenchymal cell malignancy, 10% of which is fibroblastic osteosarcoma (FOS). Due to the low incidence of osteosarcoma, the impact of many pathological factors on survival is still unclear, especially FOS. The goal of this study was to assess the latest survival rates for FOS and the risk factors affecting survival using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: Age, sex, race, SEER stage, surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, site of FOS, and survival time were collected from the SEER database for survival and prognostic factor analysis. The patients were randomly assigned to either the training cohort or the testing cohort. The overall survival (OS) curves were obtained by Kaplan-Meier according to different factors. A multivariate Cox regression model and a predictive nomogram have also been constructed. Results: The study enrolled a total of 120 patients. OS at 1, 3, and 5 years for all patients was 90.83%, 79.17%, and 70.83%, respectively. In the 5-year survival analysis, in distant of SEER stage (P<0.01), radiation (P=0.03), and no surgery (P<0.01) were associated with a worse prognosis in patients with FOS. Multivariate analysis showed that age, and in distant of SEER stage were independent indicators of unfavorable prognosis. A nomogram was used to predict the prognosis of FOS and a calibration curve was used to validate the nomogram prediction against the actual observed survival outcomes. Conclusions: In summary, older age, and worse SEER stage were associated with poorer OS. The nomogram effectively predicted the probabilities of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS, demonstrating strong concordance with the actual observed outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.