Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39145040›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Ecological phage therapy: Can bacteriophages help rapidly restore the soil microbiome?

Tarryn Davies, Christian Cando-Dumancela, Craig Liddicoat, Romy Dresken, Rudolf H Damen, Robert A Edwards, Sunita A Ramesh, Martin F Breed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Microbes Saving Lives and Reducing Suffering.Microbial biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tarryn DaviesCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0987-8018
Christian Cando-DumancelaCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0186-0056
Craig LiddicoatCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4812-7524
Romy DreskenSchool of Biological Sciences and the Environment Institute University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia.
Rudolf H DamenCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia Australia.
Robert A EdwardsCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8383-8949
Sunita A RameshCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2230-4737
Martin F BreedCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7810-9696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil microbiota underpin ecosystem functionality yet are rarely targeted during ecosystem restoration. Soil microbiota recovery following native plant revegetation can take years to decades, while the effectiveness of soil inoculation treatments on microbiomes remains poorly explored. Therefore, innovative restoration treatments that target soil microbiota represent an opportunity to accelerate restoration outcomes. Here, we introduce the concept of ecological phage therapy-the application of phage for the targeted reduction of the most abundant and dominant bacterial taxa present in degraded ecosystems. We propose that naturally occurring bacteriophages-viruses that infect bacteria-could help rapidly shift soil microbiota towards target communities. Bacteriophages sculpt the microbiome by lysis of specific bacteria, and if followed by the addition of reference soil microbiota, such treatments could facilitate rapid reshaping of soil microbiota. Here, we experimentally tested this concept in a pilot study. We collected five replicate pre-treatment degraded soil samples, then three replicate soil samples 48 hours after phage, bacteria, and control treatments. Bacterial 16S rDNA sequencing showed that phage-treated soils had reduced bacterial diversity; however, when we combined ecological phage therapy with reference soil inoculation, we did not see a shift in soil bacterial community composition from degraded soil towards a reference-like community. Our pilot study provides early evidence that ecological phage therapy could help accelerate the reshaping of soil microbiota with the ultimate aim of reducing timeframes for ecosystem recovery. We recommend the next steps for ecological phage therapy be (a) developing appropriate risk assessment and management frameworks, and (b) focussing research effort on its practical application to maximise its accessibility to restoration practitioners.

Indexed as

bacteriophageinoculationmicrobiomerestoration genomics

Identifiers

PMID39145040
PMCPMC11322231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.