Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144989›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Biomedical event argument detection method based on multi-feature fusion and question-answer paradigm.

Jinghan Tian, Shuai Xing, Qianmin Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinghan TianSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, PR China.
Shuai XingSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, PR China.
Qianmin SuSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo address the challenges arising from the rapid growth of text data in the biomedical field, including the problems of irrelevant argument interference and deep semantic association neglect in existing event argument detection methods, as well as the difficulty of multiple event extraction. We aim to propose a new event argument detection method that can accurately mine valuable information from biomedical texts through multi-feature fusion and the question-and-answer paradigm, while also addressing the limitations of existing methods.

methodsWe propose an event argument detection method based on multi-feature fusion and the question-answer paradigm. First, we split each event in the sentence into an independent question-and-answer format to reduce the complexity of detection. Then, in order to reduce the interference of irrelevant arguments, we use syntactic distance and external prior knowledge to find the corresponding argument prior template for each event type. Next, we introduce the multi-feature attention mechanism to fully explore the deep semantic features. Finally, we formulate post-processing methods for predefined event structures to form final biomedical events.

resultsOn the MLEE dataset, our model achieved 62.50% in event extraction of F1 scores, which is superior to other advanced event extraction methods.

conclusionOur method achieves good performance in the event extraction task and provides strong support for the mining of valuable information in biomedical texts.

Indexed as

Biomedical event extractionMulti-featureQuestion-answering paradigm

Identifiers

PMID39144989
PMCPMC11320457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.