Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144853›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Virtual Reality and Stress Management: A Systematic Review.

Shakila Meshkat, Mahsa Edalatkhah, Corinna Di Luciano, Josh Martin, Gursharanjit Kaur, Gyu Hee Lee, Haley Park, Andrei Torres, Ali Mazalek, Bill Kapralos and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shakila MeshkatInterventional Psychiatry Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, CAN.
Mahsa EdalatkhahDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, CAN.
Corinna Di LucianoInterventional Psychiatry Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, CAN.
Josh MartinInterventional Psychiatry Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, CAN.
Gursharanjit KaurInterventional Psychiatry Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, CAN.
Gyu Hee LeeInterventional Psychiatry Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, CAN.
Haley ParkInterventional Psychiatry Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, CAN.
Andrei TorresmaxSIMhealth Laboratory, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Toronto, CAN.
Ali MazalekSynaesthetic Media Lab, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, CAN.
Bill KapralosmaxSIMhealth Group, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Adam DubrowskiHealth Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Montreal, CAN.
Venkat BhatPsychiatry, University of Toronto/St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amidst the growing prevalence of chronic stress and its potential negative impacts on mental health, this review explores the use of virtual reality (VR) as a stress management solution, aiming to assess its viability and effectiveness in this context. A comprehensive search was conducted on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase from inception until February 2024. Eligible studies were primary research papers that focused on the use of VR as an intervention to mitigate psychological stress and/or distress. We included studies where the assessment of stress levels primarily relied on self-report measures. A total of 50 studies involving 2885 participants were included in our systematic review. VR-based interventions varied across studies, implementing tools such as cognitive behavioural therapy, exposure therapy, mindfulness and relaxation, repetition tasks, and psychoeducation. The reviewed studies yielded mixed results; however, a strong indication was present in highlighting the promising potential of VR-based interventions. Many studies observed a decrease in psychiatric symptoms in participants and reported increased quality of life. Various studies also found VR to be a valuable tool in promoting stress reduction and relaxation. VR was proven useful in exposing participants to stressors in a safe, controlled way. These potential benefits appear to come with no risk of harm to the participants. Although the findings are heterogenous, there is sufficient evidence supporting the use of VR for stress management across a range of contexts and populations. Overall, VR appears to be a generally low-risk, feasible intervention for those struggling with stress.

Indexed as

relaxationstressstress managementsystematic reviewvirtual realityvr

Identifiers

PMID39144853
PMCPMC11323791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.