ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Cardiotoxicity detection tool for breast cancer chemotherapy: a retrospective study.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Volumetric Reference Ranges for SPECT MPI Parameters and the Predictive Power of Dyssynchrony Parameters: A Cross-Sectional StudyCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with breast cancer undergoing biological therapy and/or chemotherapy perform multiple radionuclide angiography (RNA) or multigated acquisition (MUGA) scans to assess cardiotoxicity. The association between RNA imaging parameters and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) remains unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to extract and evaluate the association of several novel imaging biomarkers to detect changes in LVEF in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: We developed and optimized a novel set of MATLAB routines called the "RNA Toolbox" to extract parameters from RNA images. The code was optimized using various statistical tests ( Results: The code was reproducible and showed good agreement with validated clinical software for the parameters extracted from both packages. The regression model and ROC results were statistically significant in predicting LVEF (R Conclusions: Despite the limited sample size, we observed evidence of associations between several parameters and LVEF. We believe that these parameters will be more beneficial than the current methods for patients undergoing cardiotoxic chemotherapy. Moreover, this approach can aid physicians in evaluating subclinical cardiac changes during chemotherapy, and in understanding the potential benefits of cardioprotective drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.