Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144775›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2022

Sulforaphane Effects on Cognition and Symptoms in First and Early Episode Schizophrenia: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial.

Gangrui Hei, Robert C Smith, Ranran Li, Jianjun Ou, Xueqing Song, Yingjun Zheng, Yiqun He, Jen Arriaza, Jed W Fahey, Brian Cornblatt and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Efficacy and safety of Nrf2 activators for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Gangrui HeiDepartment of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; Hunan Medical Center for Mental Health, China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2978-9423
Robert C SmithNathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York, USA.
Ranran LiDepartment of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; Hunan Medical Center for Mental Health, China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Jianjun OuDepartment of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; Hunan Medical Center for Mental Health, China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Xueqing SongThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China.
Yingjun ZhengThe Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China.
Yiqun HeThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan 453002, China.
Jen ArriazaSchool of Professional Studies, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Jed W FaheyCenter for Human Nutrition, International Health. School of Medicine, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-1834
Brian CornblattNutramax Laboratories, Inc., Edgewood, MD, USA.
Dongyu KangDepartment of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; Hunan Medical Center for Mental Health, China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Ye YangDepartment of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; Hunan Medical Center for Mental Health, China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Jing HuangDepartment of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; Hunan Medical Center for Mental Health, China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Xiaoyi WangDepartment of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; Hunan Medical Center for Mental Health, China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Kristin CadenheadDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego and Psychiatric Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mimei ZhangColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City, NY, USA.
John M DavisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jingping ZhaoDepartment of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; Hunan Medical Center for Mental Health, China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Hua JinDepartment of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; Hunan Medical Center for Mental Health, China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Renrong WuDepartment of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; Hunan Medical Center for Mental Health, China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1758-4738

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive symptoms are associated with significant dysfunction in schizophrenia. Oxidative stress and inflammation involving histone deacetylase (HDAC) have been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Sulforaphane has antioxidant properties and is an HDAC inhibitor. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of sulforaphane on cognition dysfunction for patients with schizophrenia. Methods: This double-blind randomized 22-week trial of patients with first-episode schizophrenia was conducted in four psychiatric institutions in China. Patients were randomized to three groups (two doses of sulforaphane vs. placebo) and symptomatic and cognitive assessments were completed at multiple times. The primary outcome measure was change in the MATRICS Composite score. The secondary outcomes were change in MATRICS Domain scores, PANSS Total Scores and change in side-effects. Results: A total of 172 patients were randomized and 151 patients had at least one follow up evaluation. There were no significant effects of sulforaphane, on the primary outcome, MATRICS overall composite score. However, on secondary outcomes, sulforaphane did significantly improve performance scores on MATRICS battery Domains of spatial working memory ( Conclusion: Although the primary outcome was not significant, improvement in three domains of the MATRICS battery, suggests a positive cognitive effect on some cognitive functions, which warrants further clinical trials to further assess whether sulforaphane may be a useful adjunct for treating some types of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

cognitive symptomspsychiatric symptomsschizophreniasulforaphane

Identifiers

PMID39144775
PMCPMC11205988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.