Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144752›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T air2024

Primary Radical Effectiveness: Do the Different Chemical Reactivities of Hydroxyl and Chlorine Radicals Matter for Tropospheric Oxidation?

Peter M Edwards, Cora J Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T air, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter M EdwardsWolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DQ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1076-6793
Cora J YoungDepartment of Chemistry, York University, Toronto, ON M3J1P3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6908-5829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The atmospheric oxidation of organics occurs primarily via reaction cycles involving gas phase radical species, catalysed by nitric oxide (NO), which result in the production of secondary pollutants such as ozone. For these oxidation cycles to occur, they must be initialized by a primary radical, i.e., a radical formed from non-radical precursors. Once formed, these primary radicals can result in the oxidation of organic compounds to produce peroxy radicals that, providing sufficient NO is present, can re-generate "secondary" radicals which can go on to oxidize further organics. Thus, one primary radical can result in the catalytic oxidation of multiple organics. Although the photolysis of ozone in the presence of water vapor to form two hydroxyl (OH) radicals is accepted as the dominant tropospheric primary radical source, multiple other primary radical sources exist and can dominate in certain environments. The chemical reactivity of different radicals to organic and inorganic compounds can be very different, however, and how these differences in radical chemistry impact atmospheric organic oxidation under different atmospheric conditions has not been previously demonstrated. In this work, we use a series of model simulations to investigate the impact of the chemical reactivity of the primary radical on the effectiveness in initializing organic oxidation and thus the production of the secondary pollutant ozone. We compare the chemistries of the OH and atomic chlorine (Cl) radicals and their effectiveness at initializing organic oxidation under different nitrogen oxide and organic concentrations. The OH radical is the dominant tropospheric radical, with both primary and secondary sources. In contrast, Cl has primary sources that show significant spatial heterogeneity throughout the troposphere but is not typically regenerated in catalytic cycles. Both primary OH and Cl can initiate organic oxidation, but this work shows that the relative effectiveness with which they oxidize organics and produce ozone depends on their balance of propagation vs termination reactions which is in turn determined by the chemical environment in which they are produced. In particular, our work shows that in high NOx radical-limited environments, like those found in many urban areas, Cl will be more efficient at oxidizing organics than OH.

Identifiers

PMID39144752
PMCPMC11320563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.