ReviewNational science review2024
Detecting biomarkers by dynamic nuclear polarization enhanced magnetic resonance.
Review in National science review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Evolving Landscape of NMR Structural Elucidation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Live Metabolomics with NMR.Analytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Quantum Life Science: A Paradigm for Life Science Research.ACS nano · 2026Review
- Paramagnetic Agents for SE DNP: Synthesis and ESR Characterization of New Lipophilic Derivatives of Finland Trityl.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dynamic nuclear polarization and chemically induced hyperpolarization: Progress, mechanisms, and opportunities.Magnetic resonance letters · 2025Review
- Innovative Formulation Strategies for Biosimilars: Trends Focused on Buffer-Free Systems, Safety, Regulatory Alignment, and Intellectual Property Challenges.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Raising microwave power drives solid effect DNP enhancements beyond 500 at 9.4 T.Magnetic resonance letters · 2025Article
- Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer: Advances in Genetic Testing, Early Detection Strategies, and Personalized Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Heart Failure: A Deficiency of Energy-A Path Yet to Discover and Walk.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- The emergence of electron spin in interdisciplinary research in chemistry.National science review · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperpolarization stands out as a technique capable of significantly enhancing the sensitivity of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP), among various hyperpolarization methods, has gained prominence for its efficacy in real-time monitoring of metabolism and physiology. By administering a hyperpolarized substrate through dissolution DNP (dDNP), the biodistribution and metabolic changes of the DNP agent can be visualized spatiotemporally. This approach proves to be a distinctive and invaluable tool for non-invasively studying cellular metabolism
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.