ArticleJournal of current glaucoma practice
Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Spacer for Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy Combined with Cataract Surgery.
Article in Journal of current glaucoma practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with and without an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) implant combined with phacoemulsification (PE). Design: Interventional case series with concurrent control group. Materials and methods: Patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma underwent PE nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and were consecutively divided into a study group receiving an e-PTFE implant and a control group undergoing PE-NPDS. Intraocular pressure (IOP), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and the number of glaucoma medications at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months were recorded. Results: A total of 22 eyes of 16 patients underwent PE-NPDS, including 11 eyes receiving an e-PTFE implant and another 11 eyes with no implant. NPDS with spacer achieved successful results in all patients, including eight (72.7%) complete and three (27.3%) qualified success, 6 months, postoperatively. The corresponding values in the control group were 10 (90.9%) and 1 (9.1%), respectively. In the spacer group, mean IOP was decreased from 19.3 ± 2.8 at baseline to 12.1 ± 2.0 mm Hg at month 6 ( Conclusion: Outcomes of PE-NPDS using an e-PTFE implant were comparable to the same surgery without a spacer in the short term. Larger studies with longer follow-ups are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of this new implant. How to cite this article: Hajizadeh M, Meshksar A, Hassanpour K,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.