ArticleJournal of current glaucoma practice
Superonasal vs Inferonasal Subconjunctival Gel Stent Placement in Patients with Glaucoma.
Article in Journal of current glaucoma practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim and background: To compare the safety and efficacy of subconjunctival gel stent implantation in the superonasal (SN) vs inferonasal (IN) quadrants in the treatment of glaucoma. Materials and methods: Patients with a history of IN ( Results: Mean baseline IOP was 32.4 ± 11.7 mm Hg in the IN group and 21.6 ± 9.2 mm Hg in the SN group ( Conclusion: Both IN and SN subconjunctival gel stent placements provide favorable safety and efficacy when treating open-angle glaucoma, with a meaningful decrease in medication use and IOP. Clinical significance: Implantation of the subconjunctival gel stent in the IN quadrant is an effective and safe alternative to superior implantation in refractory glaucoma. How to cite this article: Vander Zee BL, Wilson C, Berdahl JP,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.