Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144673›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024

Study on the Optimal Leaf Area-to-Fruit Ratio of Pear Trees on the Basis of Bearing Branch Girdling and Machine Learning.

Fanhang Zhang, Qi Wang, Haitao Li, Qinyang Zhou, Zhihao Tan, Xiaochao Zu, Xin Yan, Shaoling Zhang, Seishi Ninomiya, Yue Mu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fanhang ZhangSanya Institute, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6796-3678
Qi WangSanya Institute, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.
Haitao LiAcademy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.
Qinyang ZhouAcademy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.
Zhihao TanSanya Institute, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.
Xiaochao ZuSanya Institute, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.
Xin YanSanya Institute, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.
Shaoling ZhangSanya Institute, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.
Seishi NinomiyaGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 188-0002, Japan.
Yue MuAcademy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.
Shutian TaoSanya Institute, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5281-8865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The leaf area-to-fruit ratio (LAFR) is an important factor affecting fruit quality. Previous studies on LAFR have provided some recommendations for optimal values. However, these recommendations have been quite broad and lack effectiveness during the fruit thinning period. In this study, data on the LAFR and fruit quality of pears at 5 stages were collected by continuously girdling bearing branches throughout the entire fruit development process. Five different clustering algorithms, including KMeans, Agglomerative clustering, Spectral clustering, Birch, and Spectral biclustering, were employed to classify the fruit quality data. Agglomerative clustering yielded the best results when the dataset was divided into 4 clusters. The least squares method was utilized to fit the LAFR corresponding to the best quality cluster, and the optimal LAFR values for 28, 42, 63, 91, and 112 days after flowering were 12.54, 18.95, 23.79, 27.06, and 28.76 dm

Identifiers

PMID39144673
PMCPMC11322523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.