Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144536›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic medicine

Genotoxicity and mutagenicity assessment of electronic cigarette liquids.

Hajed M Al-Otaibi, Aisha Ms Baqasi, Hani A Alhadrami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hajed M Al-OtaibiDepartment of Respiratory Therapy, Faculty of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Aisha Ms BaqasiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Hani A AlhadramiDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are often advertised as a safer alternative to traditional smoking. However, recent data suggest they may not be as safe as previously believed. This study aims to evaluate the genotoxicity and mutagenicity of e-cigarette liquids.

methodsWe randomly selected eight varieties of e-cigarette liquids from the local market in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. We evaluated their genotoxicity using the Genotoxicity SOS-Chromo Test™ Kit. In this investigation, a rat liver S9 fraction was utilized to emulate liver metabolic function to measure any chemical substance's mutagenic potential. The SOS-Chromo Test was performed by recording the β-galactosidase and alkaline phosphatase activity with and without the metabolic activation enzyme (S-9).

resultsAll samples, except for the first two dilutions of sample 2, were nongenotoxic in the absence of the S9 activation enzyme, according to the genotoxicity analysis. However, when tested in the presence of the S9 enzyme, samples 2, 4, and 7 exhibited mutagenic activity at varying concentrations.

conclusionContrary to common belief, e-cigarettes are not safe. The present investigation confirms the presence of both toxicants and carcinogens in some e-cigarette liquids. This exposure could increase users' risk of various health complications.

Indexed as

Electronic cigarettegenotoxicitymutagenicitysmokingvaping

Identifiers

PMID39144536
PMCPMC11321532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.