Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144525›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2024

A refined ICD-10 diagnoses-based approach for retrospective analysis of potential palliative care need and coverage in claims data of deceased.

Ekaterina Slotina, Bianka Ditscheid, Franziska Meissner, Ursula Marschall, Ulrich Wedding, Antje Freytag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ekaterina SlotinaInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5414-7689
Bianka DitscheidInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Franziska MeissnerInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Ursula MarschallBarmer Institute for Health Systems Research, Berlin, Wuppertal, Germany.
Ulrich WeddingDepartment of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Antje FreytagInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-2729

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: ICD-10-based approaches often provide the basis for retrospective estimation of potential palliative care need. Applying the ICD-10-based Murtagh et al. classification from 2014 (Murtagh classification), developed using mortality data, to administrative claims data leads to inconsistencies in estimating palliative care need. The aim of the study was to refine the classification for palliative care need estimation in deceased individuals with cancer and non-cancer diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective population-based study comparing Murtagh classification to a new ICD-10-based classification (revised by expert opinion) was conducted using outpatient and inpatient claims data, including billing codes for palliative care. Palliative care need was estimated for diagnoses groups and was contrasted with palliative care utilization rates in the last year of life. Our dataset included records of 417,405 individuals who deceased in 2016-2019. Results: Out of individuals deceased in 2019 ( Conclusion: Compared to the ICD10-based Murtagh classification, the revised ICD-10-based classification enables more realistic estimations if the cause of death is unavailable and reveals higher rates of palliative care coverage and differences especially in cancer versus non-cancer diseases. German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00024133).

Indexed as

administrative claimsdetermination of health care needsfacilities and services utilizationPalliative careretrospective studies

Identifiers

PMID39144525
PMCPMC11322944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.