ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2024
Intercomparison of Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Precooling Vibration Device on Pain and Anxiety Management during Administration of Local Anesthesia Injection in 6-12-year-olds.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Auxillary aids for pain and anxiety reduction during dental local anesthesia in pediatric patients: a systematic review.Evidence-based dentistry · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Cold-vibration Distraction on Pain Perception during Local Anesthesia in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Effect of mechanical vibration on peripheral blood flow in laboratory exposure: a narrative review.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To compare and evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and a vibrational precooling system in reducing pain and anxiety during the administration of local anesthesia in children aged 6-12 years old. Materials and methods: A total of 60 children aged 6-12 years old participated in this randomized controlled trial and were randomly allocated to three groups: the conventional method group, the vibrational precooling system group, and the TENS group. The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS), pulse rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded to assess the preoperative anxiety of the participating children. Sound, motor, and eyes (SEM) and face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scores were recorded during the procedure, along with pulse rate and oxygen saturation, to measure pain during the procedure. This was followed by a self-administered visual analog scale (VAS) to assess the discomfort felt by the child. Results: A statistically significant reduction in pain was observed with the usage of the vibration system and TENS, as measured by the FLACC scale, compared to the conventional method group. Similarly, statistically significant differences in SEM scores were noted between the vibrational precooling system group and the conventional method group, as well as between the TENS group and the conventional method group, with the highest scores observed in the conventional method group. The children reported the highest comfort levels with the usage of the vibration system, as indicated by the self-administered VAS. However, no statistically significant difference was observed within any group. Conclusion: The new vibrational precooling system as well as TENS can be effectively used to alleviate the pain experienced during the administration of local anesthesia. How to cite this article: Singh K, Jhingan P, Mathur S,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.