Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144477›Full record

ArticleGlomerular diseases

Faten Aqeel, Michael Joseph Cammarata, Dustin Le, Duvuru Geetha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Glomerular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Faten AqeelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael Joseph CammarataDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Dustin LeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Duvuru GeethaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although an increased risk of Methods: We performed an observational, single-center, retrospective study examining patients with AAV in clinical remission and on rituximab maintenance therapy. We divided the patients into two groups: those with and without PJP prophylaxis. We explored factors associated with PJP prophylaxis use. We additionally looked at several outcomes, including PJP infections, infections requiring hospitalizations, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and death. Data were analyzed using Results: A total of 129 patients with mean follow-up time of 7.2 (5.4) years were included: 44% received PJP prophylaxis and 56% of patients did not. There were no PJP infections in the entire cohort. Lung involvement was associated with increased odds of prescribing PJP prophylaxis (OR: 4.09 [95% CI: 1.8-9.82]). PJP prophylaxis did not decrease infection rates requiring hospitalizations, ESKD, or death. Glucocorticoid use, however, was associated with increased rates of infections requiring hospitalizations (OR: 5.54 [95% CI: 2.01-15.4]) and death (OR: 4.67 [95% CI: 1.36-15.71]) even after adjustment for age, gender, and use of PJP prophylaxis. Conclusion: Regardless of the use of PJP prophylaxis during the maintenance phase of AAV management, PJP pneumonia was not observed. AAV patients with lung involvement were more likely to be on PJP prophylaxis.

Indexed as

ANCA vasculitisPneumocystis jiroveciiProphylaxisRituximabTreatment

Identifiers

PMID39144477
PMCPMC11324239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.