ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024
Multimodal imaging for the differential diagnosis and efficacy evaluation of intraocular retinoblastoma in children with selective ophthalmic artery infusion.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common malignant tumor in children under the age of 3 years and is associated with a high disability and mortality rate. The aim of this study was, first, to evaluate the clinical efficacy of multimodal imaging in differentially diagnosing RB in children and in predicting the efficacy of selective ophthalmic artery infusion (SOAI) and, second, to identify the factors associated with this efficacy. Methods: This study retrospectively collected the data from 256 children with unilateral RB and intraocular involvement, including multimodal imaging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and clinical characteristics. Among the cases, 33 with both CT and MRI data available were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing RB, with histopathological results serving as the gold standard. Additionally, a retrospective analysis was conducted on the MRI and clinical characteristics of 256 cases of unilateral RB with intraocular involvement before SOAI treatment. The predictive ability of imaging features and clinical characteristics for the treatment efficacy of children was analyzed, and the differences in globe salvage rates and visual preservation based on different tumor stages were evaluated. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of CT imaging for RB was 96.96% while that of MRI was 84.84%, with both showing high consistency with the histopathological results. CT images demonstrated a posterior intraocular mass with a high-density appearance, with spots, patches, or clustered calcifications visible within the tumor. The CT values were mostly above 100 Hounsfield units (HU), and enhanced scanning showed varying degrees of enhancement in noncalcified masses. MRI showed low or moderate signal intensity on T1-weighted images and moderate-to-high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, with significant enhancement after contrast administration. Tumors with more calcifications showed long T1 and short T2 signals. Patients with better prognosis had a higher delta signal increase (ΔSI), a greater distance from the optic disc, smaller tumor diameter, absence of implantation nodules or smaller implantation range, endogenous growth pattern, smaller extent of retinal detachment, absence of clinical high-risk factors, no vitreous hemorrhage, no globe shrinkage, and smaller calcification volume. The distance between the tumor and optic disc, clinical high-risk factors, and tumor growth pattern were found to be independent factors associated with prognosis. The rate of successful globe salvage and visual acuity decreased with increasing tumor stage. Conclusions: CT and MRI are highly valuable for the comprehensive assessment of tumors in pediatric RB. MRI alone can complete a comprehensive assessment of patients with RB and thus allow for the reduction radiation dose in children. Calcification of the tumor is crucial for diagnosis, and imaging findings can serve to inform patient prognosis and treatment planning. The distance between the tumor and optic disc, clinical high-risk factors, and tumor growth pattern are closely related to the prognosis of children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.