ReviewTranslational pediatrics2024
Coronary artery anomalies: what are they? when to suspect? how to treat?-a narrative review.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary Artery Anomalies and Anatomical Variants: Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Background.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- The Coronary Venous System in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Anomalous Coronary Artery Origin from Pulmonary Artery and Coronary Fistulas: A Review About Coronary Steal Phenomenon.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Coronary artery anomalies in children: subtype classification, age of onset, clinical outcomes, and prognostic implications.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Risk stratification and real-world management of pediatric AAORCA: discordance between anatomical features and clinical symptoms.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Severe left ventricular dilatation and mitral regurgitation secondary to ALCAPA in childhood: a case report.Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: In the literature have been widely discussed different classification criteria for coronary artery anomalies (CAAs), some authors have tried to categorize them only as "major" or "hemodynamically significant" anomalies versus "minor" or "not hemodynamically significant" ones. However, the most recent literature has concluded that all possible coronary anatomy should be taken into consideration in a comprehensive classification of CAAs. The aim of the article is to review the most recent literature regarding CAAs to provide a comprehensive overview of this challenging topic. Methods: We propose a narrative overview of the most impactful and recent literature, synthetizing and re-elaborating the most important articles concerning CAAs. Key Content and Findings: The important gap of knowledge on the specific characteristics of CAAs has led to a progressively increased interest of the current research in this field. Albeit their nature is still unclear, an increased awareness of their fatality is spreading among clinicians and the general population, mostly associated with their clinical relevance among young patients and athletes. On the other side, we do believe that clinical and hemodynamic repercussions are of crucial importance and should always be integrated to understand the true nature of this important pathology. Conclusions: In the field of pediatric cardiology, CAAs are one of the most fascinating and studied subject. We propose a state-of-the art review to provide a comprehensive and systematic description and subsequently an approach to the epidemiological, pathophysiological, and clinical aspects of the most important CAAs in the pediatric population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.