ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Pilot study of incidence of gastroesophageal reflux after lung resection.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients undergoing lung resection may be at risk of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and silent aspiration following surgery. Defining high-risk patients may lead to prevention strategies for silent aspiration and subsequent exacerbation of underlying pulmonary disease. A pilot study of 50 patients was performed to investigate postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and the pepsin concentration in saliva. Patients answered a questionnaire concerning GERD symptoms before lung surgery and at the time of discharge. Saliva samples were obtained before surgery, on the third postoperative day and at discharge. Pepsin concentration was measured with Peptest. The pepsin concentration in saliva following resection was significantly elevated on postoperative day 3, but it returned to the baseline level at discharge. Patients undergoing resection of four or more lung subsegments had a continuously elevated pepsin concentration in saliva on postoperative day 3 [mean difference 65.63 ng/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.130-122.1] and at discharge (mean difference 76.22 ng/mL, 95% CI: 19.72-132.7). Patients with a >10% reduction of forced expiration volume in one second also had a continuous elevated pepsin concentration from the 3rd postoperative day. Lung resection resulted in elevated pepsin concentration in the saliva, which persisted in patients who received resections equivalent to or more than right middle lobectomy in volume. Resection of large volumes of lung may lead to anatomical changes and changes in breathing patterns and result in GER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.