ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
Pleural fluid biomarkers: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing the applications of liquid biopsies in oncology.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Pathobiology and clinical significance of malignant pleural effusions.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of SHOX-2 methylation for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Pleural fluid human epididymis secretory protein 4 in differentiating between malignant and benign pleural effusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Efficacy of C-Reactive Protein in Differentiating Various Causes of Exudative Pleural Effusion: Disease Research Should Not Be Exclusive to the Wealthy.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid carbohydrate antigen 72-4 for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- The large language model diagnoses tuberculous pleural effusion in pleural effusion patients through clinical feature landscapes.Respiratory research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Pleural fluid is a source from which various biomarkers can be obtained and measured to facilitate the management and prognostication of various conditions. This narrative review aims to summarise a few selected applications of pleural fluid biomarker analysis based on the latest literature. Methods: A literature search for articles published in English regarding human subjects from the period January 2000 to December 2023 was performed through PubMed. Publications considered by the authors to be relevant were included in this review, with additional references added based on the authors' judgement. This review considered both prospective and retrospective cohort studies analysing the clinical value of a range of pleural fluid biomarkers. Key Content and Findings: The biomarkers selected in this narrative review have either established clinical applicability or promising initial results which require further research. Pleural fluid adenosine deaminase, mesothelin and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide can optimize the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis, malignant mesothelioma and heart failure-related pleural effusion respectively. The detection rate for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations for lung cancer is higher in the pleural fluid than in the pleural tissue or plasma. Suitable targeted therapy in patients with detectable mutations can offer survival benefits. The pleural fluid neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 carry prognostic implications and can potentially guide subsequent treatment decisions. These biomarkers used individually, or in conjunction with other clinical parameters, should only be utilised in pre-defined, appropriate clinical conditions to maximize their clinical value. Conclusions: A great variety of different biomarkers are available for analysis in pleural fluid. Further research and development are necessary to widen the spectrum and enhance the clinical utility of pleural fluid biomarkers. Comparison with the diagnostic utilities of serum biomarkers and other investigation parameters, such as radiological findings, could be considered when evaluating the performance of pleural fluid biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.