ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Efficacy analysis of
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term response to alectinib and rapid progression in a lung squamous cell carcinoma patient harboring anTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
- Clinicogenomic Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Patients With AdvancedJCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Good responses to first-line immunotherapy-included treatment in lung squamous carcinoma with rare driver gene mutations: a report of three cases.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( Methods: We collected 11 primary lung SCC samples at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between March 2015 and October 2022. In addition, we conducted a literature search of previous studies, and a pooled analysis of 34 patients was performed. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to generate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves, and a log-rank test was used to compare PFS and OS curves for different subgroups. Results: A pooled analysis of 36 patients was performed. Nineteen patients (52.8%) achieved partial response and 9 (25.0%) had stable disease. The objective response rate was 52.8%, and the disease control rate was 77.8%. The median PFS was 7.10 months. Further, alectinib was not superior to crizotinib in prolonging PFS (9.00 Conclusions: Patients with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.