ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Impact of radiological follow-up frequency on resected lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and acceptability of a smart healthcare cloud platform based on a standardized discourse form in the postoperative follow-up of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Disruption of Radiological Surveillance Following a Global Health Crisis in Resected Lung Cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in lung cancer treatment and the subsequent improvement in oncological outcomes, the optimal frequency of radiological follow-up remains unclear. Current recommendations lack consensus and do not consider individual patient characteristics and tumor factors. This study aimed to examine the impact of radiological follow-up frequency on oncological outcomes following lung cancer resection. Methods: A prospective multicenter study, involving patients who underwent anatomical lung resection in the GEVATS database between December 2016 and March 2018. The relationship between surveillance frequency and oncological outcomes was evaluated. Two groups were established based on follow-up frequency: low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF). Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor stage, histology, lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the groups. Results: A total of 1,916 patients were included in the study, LF 444 (23.17%), HF 1,472 (76.83%). Factors associated with HF surveillance included higher stage, adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy. Subanalyses were performed after PSM for various factors, revealing significant differences between LF and HF groups in cancer-specific survival among who received adjuvant therapy {LF 53.021 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 48.622-57.421] Conclusions: Findings suggest that high-frequency surveillance only improves survival outcomes in lung cancer patients who received adjuvant treatment or had squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, future guidelines for lung cancer follow-up should consider individualizing the frequency of radiological surveillance based on patients' risk profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.